Compare commits
9 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
|
098ba37907 | ||
|
2a2d6a807b | ||
|
6b7bbbf079 | ||
|
2b3166dfa0 | ||
|
926b8d7064 | ||
|
62e0b4f037 | ||
|
24b18f6422 | ||
|
052dff7d6f | ||
|
2c4c42851d |
16
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
vendored
Normal file
16
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
||||
## PR Checklist
|
||||
<!-- Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements: -->
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Unit Tests have been added for new changes
|
||||
- [ ] API tests have been updated if applicable
|
||||
- [ ] All commented code has been removed
|
||||
- [ ] If you've added a dependency, you've ensured license is compatible with Apache 2.0 and clearly outlined the added dependency.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## What are you changing?
|
||||
<!-- Please provide a short description of the updates that are in the PR -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Anything the reviewer should know when reviewing this PR?
|
||||
|
||||
### If the there are associated PRs in other repositories, please link them here (i.e. open-amt-cloud-toolkit/repo#365 )
|
2
.github/workflows/changelog.yml
vendored
2
.github/workflows/changelog.yml
vendored
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ name: Changelog Generator
|
||||
|
||||
on:
|
||||
pull_request:
|
||||
branches: [ master ]
|
||||
branches: [ main ]
|
||||
workflow_dispatch:
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
build:
|
||||
|
2
.github/workflows/ci.yml
vendored
2
.github/workflows/ci.yml
vendored
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ name: Build RPC (Native)
|
||||
|
||||
on:
|
||||
pull_request:
|
||||
branches: [ master ]
|
||||
branches: [ main ]
|
||||
|
||||
env:
|
||||
BUILD_TYPE: Release
|
||||
|
2
.github/workflows/docker-ci.yml
vendored
2
.github/workflows/docker-ci.yml
vendored
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ name: Docker Image CI
|
||||
|
||||
on:
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches: [ master ]
|
||||
branches: [ main ]
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
build:
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
|
101
CONTRIBUTING.MD
Normal file
101
CONTRIBUTING.MD
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
|
||||
## <a name="commit"></a> Commit Message Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
We have precise rules over how our git commit messages should be formatted. This leads to more readable messages that are easy to follow when looking through the project history.
|
||||
|
||||
### Commit Message Format
|
||||
Each commit message consists of a **header**, a **body** and a **footer**. The header has a special format that includes a **type**, a **scope** and a **subject**:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
|
||||
<BLANK LINE>
|
||||
<body>
|
||||
<BLANK LINE>
|
||||
<footer>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The **header** with **type** is mandatory. The **scope** of the header is optional as far as the automated PR checks are concerned, but be advised that PR reviewers **may request** you provide an applicable scope.
|
||||
|
||||
Any line of the commit message should no be longer 72 characters! This allows the message to be easier to read on GitHub as well as in various git tools.
|
||||
|
||||
The footer should contain a reference to an Azure Boards ticket (e.g. AB#[number]).
|
||||
|
||||
Example 1:
|
||||
```
|
||||
feat(telemetry): Add new MQTT events
|
||||
|
||||
Events are now emitted over various /mps topics on MQTT for success/failures
|
||||
as they occur throughout the service.
|
||||
|
||||
Resolves: AB#2222
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Revert
|
||||
If the commit reverts a previous commit, it should begin with `revert: `, followed by the header of the reverted commit. In the body it should say: `This reverts commit <hash>.`, where the hash is the SHA of the commit being reverted.
|
||||
|
||||
### Type
|
||||
|
||||
Must be one of the following:
|
||||
|
||||
* **feat**: A new feature
|
||||
* **fix**: A bug fix
|
||||
* **docs**: Documentation only changes
|
||||
* **style**: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, etc)
|
||||
* **refactor**: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
|
||||
* **perf**: A code change that improves performance
|
||||
* **test**: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
|
||||
* **build**: Changes that affect the CI/CD pipeline or build system or external dependencies (example scopes: travis, jenkins, makefile)
|
||||
* **ci**: Changes provided by DevOps for CI purposes.
|
||||
* **revert**: Reverts a previous commit.
|
||||
|
||||
### Scope
|
||||
|
||||
Should be one of the following:
|
||||
Modules:
|
||||
* **common**: A change or addition to the common module
|
||||
* **tracker**: A change or addition to the tracker module
|
||||
* **server**: A change or addition to the server module
|
||||
* **msgs**: A change or addition to msgs module
|
||||
* **eval**: Any change to benchmark tools
|
||||
* **deps**: A change to any dependency or 3rd-party library
|
||||
* **all**: A change that affects all modules
|
||||
* *no scope*: If no scope is provided, it is assumed the PR does not apply to the above scopes
|
||||
|
||||
### Body
|
||||
Just as in the **subject**, use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes".
|
||||
Here is detailed guideline on how to write the body of the commit message ([Reference](https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)):
|
||||
```
|
||||
More detailed explanatory text, if necessary. Wrap it to about 72
|
||||
characters or so. In some contexts, the first line is treated as the
|
||||
subject of the commit and the rest of the text as the body. The
|
||||
blank line separating the summary from the body is critical (unless
|
||||
you omit the body entirely); various tools like `log`, `shortlog`
|
||||
and `rebase` can get confused if you run the two together.
|
||||
|
||||
Explain the problem that this commit is solving. Focus on why you
|
||||
are making this change as opposed to how (the code explains that).
|
||||
Are there side effects or other unintuitive consequences of this
|
||||
change? Here's the place to explain them.
|
||||
|
||||
Further paragraphs come after blank lines.
|
||||
|
||||
- Bullet points are okay, too
|
||||
|
||||
- Typically a hyphen or asterisk is used for the bullet, preceded
|
||||
by a single space, with blank lines in between, but conventions
|
||||
vary here
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Footer
|
||||
|
||||
The footer should contain a reference to JIRA ticket (e.g. SL6-0000) that this commit **Closes** or **Resolves**.
|
||||
The footer should contain any information about **Breaking Changes**.
|
||||
|
||||
**Breaking Changes** should start with the word `BREAKING CHANGE:` with a space or two newlines.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Pull Requests practices
|
||||
|
||||
* PR author is responsible to merge its own PR after review has been done and CI has passed.
|
||||
* When merging, make sure git linear history is preserved. PR author should select a merge option (`Rebase and merge` or `Squash and merge`) based on which option will fit the best to the git linear history.
|
||||
* PR topic should follow the same guidelines as the header of the [Git Commit Message](#commit-message-format)
|
7
Jenkinsfile
vendored
7
Jenkinsfile
vendored
@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ pipeline {
|
||||
PROJECT_NAME = 'OpenAMT - RPC'
|
||||
SCANNERS = 'protex'
|
||||
}
|
||||
when {
|
||||
anyOf {
|
||||
branch 'main';
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
steps {
|
||||
rbheStaticCodeScan()
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -151,4 +156,4 @@ pipeline {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ We leverage GitHub Actions as a means to build RPC automatically leveraging Gith
|
||||
|
||||
3. Click the **Run Workflow** dropdown.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Select the **Branch: master**, or a preferred version, from the **Use workflow from** dropdown.
|
||||
4. Select the **Branch: main**, or a preferred version, from the **Use workflow from** dropdown.
|
||||
|
||||
5. By default, the Build Type should be **release**.
|
||||
|
||||
|
1
vcpkg
Submodule
1
vcpkg
Submodule
Submodule vcpkg added at 5568f110b5
Reference in New Issue
Block a user